ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Clinician-documented Firearm Access and Safety Interventions for Veterans Receiving Suicide Risk Evaluation in VA Emergency Care Settings.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of an intervention to incentivize secure firearm storage among veterans at risk for suicide.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe success of clinical programs aimed at preventing suicide risk depends in part on whether they can be used to identify and act upon risk factors for suicide. Our aim in this study was to describe frequency of clinician documentation of firearm access and the delivery of safety interventions among patients who received a suicide risk evaluation in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) emergency departments (ED) or urgent care (UC) settings.
methodsWe used electronic health record data of patients who received care in VHA ED/UC settings January 2021-October 2022 and underwent suicide risk evaluation by clinicians using the Veterans Affairs (VA) Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE) prior to discharging home. The proportion of patients with self-reported firearm access was identified from clinician-documented CSRE templates. Among those who reported firearm access, we identified the proportion who received any safety intervention (delivery of lethal means safety counseling and/or distribution of firearm cable locks per CSRE documentation, or update/creation/review of a VA Safety Plan) within 24 hours of the ED/UC encounter. We compared differences using chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical outcomes and analysis of variance or independent sample t-tests for continuous outcomes.
resultsOf 17,194 patients who were discharged home, 15.2% were documented as having firearm access (8.5% access to "other" lethal means, 68.8% no lethal means access, 7.4% unknown access). Of 2,624 patients with documented firearm access, 80.6% were documented as having received a safety intervention. Of those, 56.8% received lethal means safety counseling, 13.2% received a firearm cable lock, and 88.6% reviewed or completed a new or updated VA Safety Plan.
conclusionAmong patients who underwent suicide risk evaluation prior to discharging home from a Veterans Health Administration ED/UC setting, a low percentage were documented as having firearm access. Of those with firearm access, a large majority received at least one safety intervention. System-wide strategies to encourage delivery of safety interventions can reach a large proportion of at-risk patients. Additional efforts are needed to increase reporting and documentation of firearm access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.