ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
National Survey of Telemedicine Curricula Among Emergency Medicine Residencies.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTelehealth continues to reshape healthcare delivery in the United States. Recognizing its growing importance and the need for advances in education, the Association of American Medical Colleges released telehealth competencies in 2021, and the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently proposed a structured telemedicine experience as part of all emergency medicine (EM) residencies. Despite these efforts, it is unclear whether EM residencies have adopted these new educational mandates. Our primary objective in this study was to understand whether (and how) U.S. EM residencies have implemented telehealth education.
methodsWe developed a cross-sectional, national survey to describe existing telehealth curricula among ACGME-accredited EM residencies. Program directors were surveyed via email. Our primary outcome measure was the percentage of residencies with existing telehealth curricula. Secondary outcomes assessed telehealth curricula emphases, implementation barriers, and telehealth's perceived importance to EM training.
resultsOf 282 U.S.-based EM residencies, 67 programs responded (24% response rate). Of these, only five (7.5%) reported having a formal telehealth curriculum. Programs with curricula were likely to teach real-time telehealth skills (80%) and focus on data collection (80%), patient safety (80%), and communication (60%). Programs without curricula identified prioritization of other curricula (76%), insufficient faculty expertise (65%), and limited infrastructure (50%) as barriers. We also found that 61% of programs viewed telehealth education as of limited importance to EM training. At the same time, program directors expressed interest in the development of asynchronous telehealth content from trusted national EM organizations (60%).
conclusionFormal telehealth curricula remain the exception rather than the rule among U.S. EM residencies. Despite accreditation bodies urging its adoption, telehealth education faces multiple barriers, including limited faculty expertise, lack of telehealth infrastructure, and low perceived education importance. Our research suggests that national organizations may play a key role in providing early telehealth education while programs adapt to these new educational requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.