ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
SonoGuar: A Self-healing Hydrogel for Higher Fidelity Ultrasound-guided Procedure Training.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SonoGuar: A Self-healing Hydrogel for Higher Fidelity Ultrasound-guided Procedure Training.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUltrasound-compatible procedural phantoms are critical for vascular access training, but commercial models are expensive, degrade with use, and provide limited simulation of key procedural steps. Existing low-cost alternatives often lack durability and fidelity.
methodsWe synthesized a novel, self-healing, ultrasound-compatible hydrogel (SonoGuar) using guar gum, borax, glycerol, oil, and water. We constructed vascular-access task trainers and evaluated SonoGuar across three domains: 1) rheological analysis of viscoelastic recovery after injury; 2) a blinded ultrasound image comparison study comparing SonoGuar against a commercial model; and 3) a prospective, randomized, single-blind crossover simulation study comparing SonoGuar to a commercial model with 41 participants (medical students, residents, and attendings).
resultsAt grocery store material prices, one kilogram of SonoGuar took 10 minutes of active time and about $3 to fabricate, including vessel-mimic balloons. The commercial comparison model was quoted at $350 for a single replacement insert. SonoGuar recovered its viscoelastic profile within 30 minutes of injury and demonstrated visible healing of needle tracts by five hours. In the image comparison, SonoGuar was 1.8 times more likely than the commercial model to be selected as resembling human tissue in a head-to-head comparison (64.5% SonoGuar vs 35.5% commercial model, P < .001). In simulation, 41-residents and attendings rated SonoGuar higher than the commercial phantom across all model aspects, including anatomy identification, appearance, tactile feedback, and needle visualization (average of 4.47 vs 3.77 on a 5-point Likert scale, P < .01). After cost was disclosed, all preferred SonoGuar. Medical students rated both models similarly across all model aspects and demonstrated increased levels of confidence after training with SonoGuar or commercial phantom (pre-simulation average confidence on a 5-point Likert scale of 1.46 and post-simulation average of 3.54 and 3.37, respectively, both comparisons P < .05).
conclusionA do-it-yourself, high-fidelity hydrogel with self-healing properties, SonoGuar can be rapidly fabricated and is suitable for realistic, durable, and scalable ultrasound-guided procedure training. The low-cost hydrogel outperformed a leading commercial model in imaging realism, user confidence, and overall preference among experienced clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.