ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Reducing Waste: Instrument Recycling in the Emergency Department.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmergency medicine (EM) residency programs are required to teach quality improvement (QI), yet few adopt a sustainability lens to QI despite broad recognition of the importance of climate sustainability in healthcare. To address this gap, some programs have piloted innovative approaches such as sustainability QI electives or projects, although evidence of their effectiveness remains limited.
methodsWe designed and implemented a sustainability QI initiative to recycle used instruments from three bedside procedure kits (laceration repair, incision and drainage, chest tube placement) commonly used in the emergency department to reduce waste. Our goal was to describe the effectiveness of a financial intervention on instrument recycling by comparing the differences in recycling rates between the baseline and incentive periods using a quasi-Poisson regression analysis.
resultsAt the end of the first year of instrument recycling, the recycling rate was 9%. Providing a financial incentive to residents over a two-year period significantly increased the recycling rate to a mean of 24% (standard deviation 13), with a rate ratio of 3.03 (95% CI 1.57-5.85), P < .001. While the residents did not meet their recycling target of 50% to receive the incentive payment, their overall recycling rate increased.
conclusionProviding a financial incentive to residents for recycling efforts was modestly successful in encouraging residents to participate in an instrument recycling initiative. Motivating busy clinicians to engage in sustainable practice is challenging; projects that prioritize systems-level changes may be more effective than those that require changes in individual clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.