Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Effect of Awareness of Excessive Use of Force on the Psychological Well-being and Workplace Environment of Emergency Physicians: A Pilot Study.
Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExcessive use of force by law enforcement officers is a critical public health issue linked to serious health consequences such as hypertension, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression. While emergency physicians (EP) are often the first to treat patients with excessive use of force-related injuries, the work-life and psychological toll of witnessing these incidents remains underexplored. In this study, we examine how awareness of and exposure to excessive use of force affects the psychological well-being and professional environment of EPs.
methodsAn observational cross-sectional survey was developed by EPs and psychiatrists to assess work-life and psychological impacts of awareness of excessive use of force on EPs. The survey included multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions and used the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). It was distributed anonymously to EPs at three Texas academic institutions. We used the Fisher exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare groups. Our primary outcome measure was psychological distress, assessed with the IES-R. Secondary outcome measures included self-reported effects of awareness of excessive use of force on subjects' work environments, patient care, and interactions with law enforcement.
resultsOf 282 surveys sent to EPs, 43 responded (15%). Eighteen of 40 (45%) reported experiencing work-life impacts and 15 of 40 (37.5%) experienced psychological distress; three did not comment. Abnormal IES-R scores were found in seven (19.6%) of 35 participants; eight did not respond. Participants who noted work-life effects of excessive use of force were more likely than those whose work-life was not affected to report modified patient care approaches (61% vs 0%, P < .001), altered interactions with law enforcement (83% vs 0%, P < .001), and altered interactions with patients (50% vs 0%, P < .001). Psychological distress was more prevalent among participants with personal exposure to excessive use of force compared to those without personal exposure (47% vs 12%, P = .02), and among those with second-hand exposure compared to those without second-hand exposure to excessive use of force (80% vs 56%, P = .04).
conclusionThis pilot study demonstrates that exposure to excessive use of force is associated with psychological distress and professional impact among emergency physicians, influencing interactions with patients and law enforcement. These findings underscore the need for further characterization of the effects of awareness of and exposure to excessive use of force on EPs. This, in turn, may inform institutional interventions and national protocols aimed at mitigating psychological burden, supporting physician resilience, and promoting high-quality, equitable patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.