ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2026
Open bite malocclusion and orofacial dysfunction in patients with rare diseases.
Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare orofacial dysfunctions (OFD) in individuals with rare diseases, with and without open bite (OB) malocclusion, and to explore the associated symptoms. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn total, data for 788 individuals representing 164 different rare diseases, were collected from the MHC database for the period of 2013-2019. The inclusion criteria were having a rare disease and having completed the Nordic Orofacial Test-Screening (NOT-S). OB was categorized as anterior OB (AOB), lateral OB (LOB), and severe anterior OB (AOBS). The sample was divided into two groups: 142 with OB (mean age, 14.2 ± 13.0 years; 81 males, 61 females); and 557 with normal vertical relation (NVR) (mean age, 15.1 ± 12.9 years; 292 males, 265 females). OFD was compared between the groups. Items from the NOT-S test were analysed, and the Odds Ratio (OR) for OB was calculated.
resultsThe OB prevalence was 18%, with AOB being the most-common sub-type (58%), followed by AOBS (15%) and LOB (13%). Nemaline myopathy was the disease with the highest prevalence rates for OB and AOBS. The OB group had a larger proportion of OFD than the NVR group in 6/12 domains of the NOT-S. Deviant tongue posture was most strongly associated with OB (OR 6.062).
conclusionTwo-thirds of the individuals had OFD, and OB was a common finding (18%). Rare diseases with symptoms of orofacial hypotonia, craniofacial abnormalities and macroglossia show a higher prevalence of OB. A deviant tongue posture showed the highest odds for OB in this group of rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.