ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Real-World Meditation App Engagement: Longitudinal Study of the Medito Meditation App.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the EQ-HWB-9 in a mental health sample and an investigation of modifications to items.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Trial
- The Effectiveness and Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness of Regular Meditation for Improving Quality of Life: Protocol for a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meditation apps are increasingly popular but face significant engagement challenges. Most research does not meaningfully capture real-world engagement or associated user characteristics. Engagement patterns and reasons for engaging or disengaging remain relatively unexplored. Objective: This study aimed to examine Medito app user engagement over the first 30 days after download and how intended use, demographics, user traits, and mental health factors predict engagement. Methods: A prospective online survey was conducted among 668 Medito app users from 30 countries. Factors assessed included demographic factors (eg, age, sex, education, employment, and country of residence); user factors (eg, number of apps tried, hours of experience, meditation-related adverse events, expectations, readiness to change, and personality); and mental health factors (eg, quality of life, perceived stress, psychological distress, well-being, and satisfaction with life). Detailed engagement data included days of use, meditations completed, app opens, and minutes of use obtained via a data-sharing agreement with Medito. Minutes of use in the first 30 days after download served as the main outcome variable. Results: App use was relatively low, with 50% (328/655) of users engaging for a total of 16 minutes or less in the first month after download (median 16.11, IQR 0-74.51 min). Fewer than 20% (124/655, 18.86%) of users continued using the app after 14 days. Intended use (mean 418.56, SD 472.5) significantly exceeded actual use (mean 70.02, SD 176.81; d=0.710; P<.001). In terms of user factors, expectation match (ie, extent to which outcomes from the app matched initial expectations; ρ=0.214; P=.002), expectations for anxiety (ρ=0.102; P=.01), expectations for attention or focus (ρ=0.091; P=.02), and conscientiousness (ρ=0.124; P=.003) were associated with higher engagement. Neuroticism was negatively associated with engagement (ρ=-0.103; P=.010). For mental health factors, satisfaction with life (ρ=0.123; P=.002) and well-being (ρ=0.135, P<.001) were associated with higher engagement, while perceived stress (ρ=-0.107; P=.007), psychological distress (ρ=-0.138, P<.001), and quality of life (ρ=-0.100; P=.011) were associated with lower engagement. Only readiness to change showed unique associations with higher engagement (semipartial r=0.156; P<.001). Regression analysis showed that only perceived stress predicted higher engagement (β=.020; P=.04). However, when mental health was included as a single component, expectations for anxiety (β=.015; P=.049) and readiness to change (β=.011; P=.048) predicted greater engagement, and mental ill health predicted lower engagement (β=-0.008; P=.049). Conclusions: Overall, app engagement is generally quite low. Acute stress motivated meditation app use, while chronic stress disrupted it. Engagement is optimal when experiences match expectations and users are prepared to make a change. More transparency is necessary in the promotion of meditation apps so that users have a realistic understanding of the time and effort required to achieve benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.