ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Predicting 5-Year Mortality in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using the Korean Central Cancer Registry: Model Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common cancers and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, making prognostic prediction clinically essential. Machine learning models are increasingly used to assess prognosis; however, developing systems that combine high discrimination with clear, clinically interpretable reasoning remains challenging. Objective: This study aimed to develop deep learning models that predict 5-year mortality in NSCLC using data from the Korea Central Cancer Registry and quantify feature importance through permutation testing. Methods: We identified 3144 patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 who had complete clinical data, pulmonary function test results, histological information, genomic data, and staging details. After preprocessing, the cohort was divided into stratified training, validation, and test sets in a 70%-15%-15% ratio. Five models were tuned using Hyperband across 10 predefined feature groups. The primary evaluation metric was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); additional metrics included accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall. Groupwise permutation importance was calculated for each model, and the concordance of importance rankings was assessed using the Friedman test. Results: All 5 models yielded comparable discrimination values on the test set (AUC=0.875-0.879). Model A was selected as the primary model and achieved an AUC of 0.879, an accuracy of 0.806, an F1-score of 0.824, and a Brier score of 0.142. Permuting the stage resulted in the largest decrease in AUC (0.217), followed by the pulmonary function test (0.016). Gene mutation had a modest overall impact but became more influential within the adenocarcinoma subset. The Friedman test showed no statistically significant differences in importance rankings across the models (P=.93). Conclusions: A grouped-input deep learning framework achieved discrimination comparable to a conventional Cox proportional hazards model using the same routine clinical variables for 5-year mortality prediction in NSCLC. Group-level permutation importance provided stable and reproducible insights into the clinical factors influencing risk, which may guide future model refinement and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.