ArticleAge and ageing2026
The optimal blood pressure target in old and very old patients with hypertension.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the rise in older population globally, the optimal blood pressure (BP) target for antihypertensive therapy in those aged 60 and above remains to be evaluated in the real-world practice. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of standard versus lower BP targets in old (aged 60-79) and very old (aged ≥80) patients with hypertension in real-world clinical settings.
methodsWe emulated a target trial using electronic medical records from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority, including patients aged 60 years or above with a diagnosis of hypertension, uncontrolled BP and records of antihypertensives adjustments from 2008 to 2013. Patients were first categorized into 3 age groups (60-69, 70-79, ≥ 80) and then assigned to BP targets of either 130-140/80-90 mmHg or below 130/80 mmHg. Outcomes included major cardiovascular disease (CVD), end-stage renal disease, all-cause mortality and major adverse events related to antihypertensive treatment.
resultsOf 132 430 eligible patients identified, 52 553, 28 661 and 7106 patients aged 60-69, 70-79 and ≥ 80 years had BP targets of 130-140/80-90 mmHg, respectively; 11 148, 5636 and 1203 of patients in the same age groups had targets below 130/80 mmHg. Lower BP target was associated with reduced overall CVD and all-cause mortality: aged 60-69 years (CVD HR: 0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.96]; all-cause mortality: 0.89 [0.81-0.98]), aged 70-79 years (CVD: 0.87 [0.82-0.93]; all-cause mortality: 0.84 [0.78-0.91]), and aged≥80 years (CVD: 0.77 [0.69-0.86]; all-cause mortality: 0.80 [0.72-0.89]). No significant increase in major adverse events was observed in any age group. Results were consistent across all subgroups.
conclusionLowering BP of below 130/80 mmHg in old and very old patients was associated with better cardiovascular and mortality outcomes without increased adverse events. These findings suggest that a lower BP target may be beneficial and safe for older patients with hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.