Observational studyPloS one2026
Inequalities in referrals to social prescribing from primary care in England: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial prescribing is a growing community health intervention and has been associated with improved patient outcomes. However, the evidence around inequalities in referrals shows varying patterns. We aim to examine referrals to social prescribing link workers funded by the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme in England.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational population-based study, using primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum from 1st July 2019-31st March 2024. Participants included over 12 million patients aged 16 years or older. We examined the likelihood of offers and subsequent referrals to social prescribing by patient- and area-level characteristics using logistic regression and report odds ratios (ORs).
resultsSince July 2019, approximately 4% of the CPRD population have been offered a referral to social prescribing. 77·7% of those were referred. Patients who are: female, older, living in less deprived areas and have multiple long-term conditions have higher odds of being offered social prescribing (Female OR = 1·35, 95% CI [1·32 to 1·38] p < 0.001). Factors such as region, rurality, and ethnicity do not result in inequalities in offers compared to the general population. Of those offered, we find that those who are female, those from non-white ethnicities (Black, Asian and Mixed), and have multiple long-term conditions had higher odds of accepting offers of referrals (being referred).
conclusionReferrals to social prescribing have increased following the national rollout of link workers. However, inequalities in offers and referrals to social prescribing have been identified by patient and area-level factors. Our findings indicate that policies should improve awareness of social prescribing in deprived areas and direct certain patient groups, such as ethnic minorities, males and those older to the benefits of being referred to social prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.