ArticlePloS one2026
Can AI applied on MRI reliably predict shunt response in INPH? A comprehensive exploration of deep learning and radiomics approaches using preoperative MRI.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a treatable neurological condition, yet predicting which patients will benefit from a cerebrospinal fluid shunt remains challenging. Structural brain MRI is a core part of the diagnostic workup, but traditional radiological measures show limited predictive accuracy. This study aimed to assess whether deep learning and radiomics-based machine learning approaches can provide clinically useful predictions of shunt outcome based on preoperative MRI.
methodsWe investigated 149 shunted INPH patients with available preoperative T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Patients were classified as responders (n = 113) or non-responders (n = 36) based on postoperative gait speed improvement. For INPH, this is a large sample with typical outcome distribution. Three artificial intelligence approaches were tested: a late-fusion ensemble of multiple 3D convolutional neural networks; a multimodal intermediate fusion model; and radiomics-based machine learning models trained on features extracted from whole-brain masks. Models were assessed using 10-fold cross-validation. The best performing model on the validation set was selected from each approach. Performance metrics included the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsPerformance was considered poor in all models, and none reached an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve above 70%. Of the three methodologies, the best performance was achieved with a radiomics-based model (Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier on T1-weighted images) which achieved an AUROC of 63.7%. In a reduced subset of clearly separated responders and non-responders (n = 72), the best model (late fusion ensemble of 5 convolutional neural networks) reached an AUROC of 69.2%.
conclusionsDespite the use of advanced artificial intelligence techniques, structural MRI alone were insufficient for reliably predicting gait outcome after surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. To capture the complexity of the condition and enable clinically meaningful predictions, our findings indicate the need for research investigating multimodal input and using large multi-center datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.