Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42258489›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Preclinical animal models for onchocerciasis and loiasis: A systematic review of applications in drug screening.

Rene Bilingwe Ayiseh, Blendin Serri Gemuh, Glory Enjong Mbah, Stephen Mbigha Ghogomu, Fidelis Cho-Ngwa

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rene Bilingwe AyisehDrugs and Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory (DMD), Biotechnology Unit, University of Buea, South West Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-1666
Blendin Serri GemuhDrugs and Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory (DMD), Biotechnology Unit, University of Buea, South West Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5448-4833
Glory Enjong MbahDepartment of Biology, Higher Teacher Training College (HTTC), The University of Bamenda, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Stephen Mbigha GhogomuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (BMB), Faculty of Science, University of Buea, South West Region, Cameroon.
Fidelis Cho-NgwaDrugs and Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory (DMD), Biotechnology Unit, University of Buea, South West Region, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnchocerciasis and loiasis are co-endemic filarial neglected tropical diseases in Central and West Africa. While ivermectin-based mass drug administration has reduced onchocerciasis burden, it can trigger severe neurological adverse events in individuals with high Loa loa microfilaraemia. This limitation highlights the urgent need for safe macrofilaricidal therapies and appropriate preclinical models. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate animal models used for preclinical drug screening in onchocerciasis and loiasis. Studies published between 1990 and 2025 were retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar, and one-hundred and one eligible study were included in the qualitative synthesis. Models were assessed based on parasite stage permissiveness, survival duration, physiological relevance, host immune status, and suitability for drug evaluation. The bovine Onchocerca ochengi natural infection system emerged as the most physiologically relevant model, supporting the full parasite life cycle. Immunocompromised mouse models, including SCID and humanised NSG mice, allow controlled evaluation of parasite development and direct drug effects but incompletely reproduce human infection. Intraperitoneal adult male O. ochengi implant models in SCID mice and gerbils provide robust platforms for macrofilaricide screening. Semi-permissive rodent models offer practical systems for early-stage screening but are limited by non-physiological parasite localisation. For loiasis, non-human primate models, particularly Papio anubis, remain the most representative system. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: No single model fully recapitulates human co-endemic infection. While the bovine model remains the gold standard, rodent implant models enable scalable screening. The absence of a physiologically relevant co-infection model remains a major barrier to developing safe macrofilaricides.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalFilaricidesLoiasisOnchocerciasisAnimalsCattleDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansLoaMaleMiceOnchocercaFilaricides

Identifiers

PMID42258489
PMCPMC13271504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.