SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Preclinical animal models for onchocerciasis and loiasis: A systematic review of applications in drug screening.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnchocerciasis and loiasis are co-endemic filarial neglected tropical diseases in Central and West Africa. While ivermectin-based mass drug administration has reduced onchocerciasis burden, it can trigger severe neurological adverse events in individuals with high Loa loa microfilaraemia. This limitation highlights the urgent need for safe macrofilaricidal therapies and appropriate preclinical models. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate animal models used for preclinical drug screening in onchocerciasis and loiasis. Studies published between 1990 and 2025 were retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar, and one-hundred and one eligible study were included in the qualitative synthesis. Models were assessed based on parasite stage permissiveness, survival duration, physiological relevance, host immune status, and suitability for drug evaluation. The bovine Onchocerca ochengi natural infection system emerged as the most physiologically relevant model, supporting the full parasite life cycle. Immunocompromised mouse models, including SCID and humanised NSG mice, allow controlled evaluation of parasite development and direct drug effects but incompletely reproduce human infection. Intraperitoneal adult male O. ochengi implant models in SCID mice and gerbils provide robust platforms for macrofilaricide screening. Semi-permissive rodent models offer practical systems for early-stage screening but are limited by non-physiological parasite localisation. For loiasis, non-human primate models, particularly Papio anubis, remain the most representative system. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: No single model fully recapitulates human co-endemic infection. While the bovine model remains the gold standard, rodent implant models enable scalable screening. The absence of a physiologically relevant co-infection model remains a major barrier to developing safe macrofilaricides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.