ArticlePloS one2026
Exploration of comorbidity mechanisms between chronic pain and depression: Machine learning prediction models and SHAP interpretability analysis based on the CHARLS cohort.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning Reveals Pattern-Specific Drivers of Depression in Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Multimorbidity: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study from CHARLS.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith rapid population aging in China, depression among middle-aged and older adults has become a major public health concern. Chronic pain and sociodemographic factors are closely associated with depressive symptoms, yet their combined and heterogeneous effects are difficult to capture using traditional analytical approaches. Interpretable machine learning provides a framework to explore depression-related risk patterns within a biopsychosocial perspective.
methodsData were obtained from seven waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011-2020), including 38,970 adults aged 45 years and older. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10). Predictors covering sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and pain at specific anatomical sites were selected using LASSO regression and recursive feature elimination. Seven machine learning models-logistic regression, Bernoulli and Gaussian Naive Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and k-nearest neighbors-were developed and evaluated using accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision, recall, and F1-score. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsChronic pain, particularly involving the lower limbs and spine, showed a strong association with depressive status. Model accuracy ranged from 61.6% to 71.9%, with AUC values between 0.61 and 0.72. SVM and Gaussian Naive Bayes demonstrated relatively better overall discrimination, though sensitivity for depressive cases remained limited. SHAP analysis identified lower limb pain and a nonlinear association with body mass index as key contributors to depression risk prediction. DISCUSSION: Integrating interpretable machine learning with a biopsychosocial framework highlights the dominant role of pain-related features in depression risk patterns among older adults. Given limited sensitivity for depressive case identification, these models are more suitable for population-level risk exploration than direct clinical screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.