ArticlePloS one2026
Biochemical and antidiabetic properties of Elaeocarpus angustifolius Blume: In vitro, In vivo, and In silico insights.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes poses an utmost threat to human health; significant progress in the discovery of antidiabetic drugs has been made, but their side effects cannot be ignored. As a plant-based alternative, this study explored the pharmacological potential of Elaeocarpus angustifolius Blume (Rudraksha), emphasizing its antioxidant and antidiabetic activities, supported by in silico analysis. Phytochemical screening of the methanol bark extract confirmed the presence of flavonoids, alkaloids, carbohydrates, glycosides, terpenoids, tannins, and phenols. The extract exhibited high total phenolic and flavonoid contents (182.73 ± 0.001 mg GAE/g and 48.78 ± 0.06 mg QE/g, respectively). The LC-MS analysis of the ethyl acetate fraction identified thirteen phytoconstituents, including phenolic acids, flavonoids, and tannins. The ethyl acetate fraction demonstrated significant antioxidant activity (IC₅₀ = 1.47 ± 0.37 µg/mL), outperforming quercetin (IC₅₀ = 4.87 ± 0.16 µg/mL). Enzyme inhibition assays revealed methanol extract has strong α-glucosidase (IC₅₀ = 0.79 ± 0.13 µg/mL) and α-amylase (IC₅₀ = 3.48 ± 0.00 µg/mL) inhibitory effects, comparable to acarbose (IC₅₀ = 13.51 ± 0.22 µg/mL and IC₅₀ = 25.30 ± 0.85 µg/mL), respectively. In a 28-day in vivo study, oral administration of the methanol bark extract significantly (p < 0.01) reduced fasting serum glucose levels and improved lipid profiles, with decreases in triglycerides (5%) and total cholesterol (2%), and an increase in HDL (5%) compared with baseline. The extract-treated group also showed higher hepatic glycogen content (14.06 ± 0.002 mg/mL) than the Gliclazide-treated group (12.82 ± 0.002 mg/mL). In silico molecular docking identified Corilagin exhibiting the highest binding affinity (-10.3 kcal/mol), stable interaction (RMSD = 1.469 ± 0.133 Å), and favorable binding free energy (ΔGBFE = -27.48 ± 3.15) with α-amylase, suggesting that it may act as a competitive inhibitor of an enzyme's active site. Overall, these findings highlight that E. angustifolius bark significantly inhibits glucose absorption and improves dyslipidemia to some extent, while in silico analysis suggests that Corilagin has potential as an inhibitory activity against type-2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.