ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Using Collaborative Model Building to Better Understand the Mechanisms of Alcohol-Involved Sexual Violence on College Campuses: Post Hoc Protocol.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Collaborative Model Building Project to Understand Sexual Violence (CAMPUS) study seeks to address alcohol-involved sexual violence (AISV) by collaboratively developing an agent-based model (ABM) that can support the decisions of college campuses seeking to address this issue among students. As a first step toward ABM development, we used collaborative model building (CMB), an adaptation of group model building, to co-develop a causal loop diagram (CLD) depicting key causes and effects of AISV and opportunities for intervention. Our goal of cocreating a CLD that can be translated into an ABM to support intervention decision-making differentiates our approach from other participatory systems science studies. Objective: This paper provides a detailed, transferable post hoc protocol for using CMB to cocreate a CLD of AISV on college campuses that can be translated into an ABM to support intervention decision-making. Methods: Our approach consisted of 4 iterative phases that involved ongoing weekly discussion by the project's core modeling team (CMT), consisting of researchers with systems science and subject matter expertise. In the first phase, we conducted 4 CMB sessions with 3 groups of college campus collaborators to develop 1 preliminary CLD each. Second, our CMT reviewed each variable and causal connection across the CLDs in consultation with peer-reviewed literature to help ensure eventual ABM translation. Third, the CMT combined 3 CLDs into one, identifying specific loops for review by collaborators. Fourth, we conducted a feedback session with collaborators and created a finalized CLD linked with intervention opportunities. Results: Between January 2023 and March 2025, we engaged with 39 collaborators in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, across three groups: (1) college campus practitioners (eg, student life staff; n=8), (2) undergraduate students (n=12), and (3) a mix of practitioners and students (n=19). The final output of our process was a complete CLD with 26 loops containing 28 variables showing key AISV mechanisms and intervention opportunities. Analysis of results from the CAMPUS study, funded from September 2022 to June 2027, is ongoing, and results from aim 1 of the study are expected to be published in late 2026. Conclusions: Given our goal of using the finalized CLD for ABM development, our approach emphasized the selection of potentially measurable and modifiable variables and causal connections. Compared with other participatory systems science approaches, our approach also emphasized intervention identification and prioritization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.