ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2026
Clinical actionability of molecular testing in advanced thyroid cancer: a real-world cohort study.
Article in European thyroid journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Molecular testing is increasingly used in thyroid cancer (TC) to complement diagnostics and guide systemic therapy choices. However, real-world data on its clinical impact remain limited. We evaluated the molecular landscape, clinical actionability, and outcomes of matched therapy in patients with advanced TC. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 103 patients with advanced TC who underwent panel-based molecular testing with potential treatment consequences at Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, between 2014 and 2024. Alterations were classified using the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT), and details on matched treatment and follow-up were collected. Results: Molecular testing was performed at diagnosis (51.5%; primarily anaplastic TC) or upon disease progression (48.5%; primarily differentiated and medullary TC). Most frequent alterations were TP53 (39.8%), NRAS (17.5%), BRAF (16.5%), PTEN (16.5%), and RET (11.7%). Potential targetable alterations (ESCAT level I-III) were detected in 62.1% of patients, and 32.0% harbored ESCAT level I or II alterations considered clinically actionable. Matched systemic therapy was initiated in 16 patients and demonstrated an objective response rate of 56.3% and a disease control rate of 68.8%. Durable responses were predominantly observed in patients with ESCAT level I or II alterations (BRAF, RET, and NTRK). Matched therapy was associated with a trend toward longer overall survival (123.0 vs 57.0 months; P = 0.058). Conclusion: Molecular testing frequently revealed targetable alterations in patients with advanced TC, and matched therapies yielded meaningful clinical benefit. These findings underscore the value of precision medicine in TC and support broader implementation of molecular-guided treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.