ArticleJAMA neurology2026
Pathology and Genetics in a Global Cohort of Parkinsonian Disorders.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antemortem α-Synuclein levels from neuron-derived extracellular vesicles identify Lewy Body pathology in Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer Disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Neurodegenerative diseases and environmental risk factors: an overview of the available scientific evidence.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative movement disorders is challenging because of a lack of in vivo biomarkers, overlapping clinical features, and a delay in the emergence of pathognomonic features. Objective: To evaluate clinicopathological correlation, diagnostic accuracy, genetic association with pathology, and ancestry-related differences in a multiancestry brain bank cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, retrospective, autopsy-confirmed cross-sectional brain bank study on donors enrolled between 1985 and 2024. Included were donors from 11 academic brain banks in the UK, US, and Australia. Among brain donors with available genetic data from participating brain banks, included were individuals with clinical diagnoses of Parkinson disease, Parkinson disease dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome, multiple system atrophy, or neurologically normal controls. Exposures: Genetic variant carrier status and clinical diagnostic category. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included clinical diagnostic accuracy, Lewy body and Alzheimer disease pathology burden, survival, association with genetic variants, and genetically inferred ancestry. Results: Among 5648 brain donors with available genetic data, a total of 3353 eligible donors (mean [SD] age at death, 76.8 [10.6] years; 2072 male [61.8%]) were included. Misdiagnosis rates for movement disorders ranged approximately from 10% to 20%. Clinical diagnoses of dementia with parkinsonism (ie, Parkinson disease dementia and DLB) were more strongly associated with Lewy body pathology than Parkinson disease without dementia (odds ratio [OR], 1.96; 95% CI, 1.30-3.04; P = 7.2 × 10-4). Lewy pathology was identified in 33 of 745 of neurologically normal controls (4.4%). Alzheimer disease copathology was present in 426 of 1064 cases (40.0%) with Lewy body disease. Carriers of the GBA1 variant exhibited greater Lewy body burden compared with noncarriers (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.24-3.03; P = .01) or carriers of the LRRK2 variant (OR, 7.44; 95% CI, 2.16-25.64; P = .01). Pathological diagnoses differed by ancestry, with South Asian donors more likely to have progressive supranuclear palsy pathology and Ashkenazi Jewish donors more likely to have Lewy body disease (χ22 = 35.5; P < .001), independent of GBA1 and LRRK2 variant status. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cross-sectional brain bank study highlight the value of integrating genetic and pathological data to improve diagnostic accuracy. The high prevalence of Alzheimer disease copathology and ancestry-associated differences in pathology point to the need for biologically informed diagnostic tools. These results suggest supporting the integration of genetically and pathologically stratified approaches, correlating pathology with in vivo biomarkers, for future therapeutic trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.