Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42258143›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Pediatric pulmonary resections: indications, surgical approaches, and outcomes in a 15-year single-center experience.

Atilla Can, Halil Şen, Hüseyin Yıldıran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atilla CanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey. atillacan_ac@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9603-2861
Halil ŞenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1924-4086
Hüseyin YıldıranDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0126-2531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric pulmonary resections are performed for a wide spectrum of congenital, infectious, and neoplastic diseases; however, clinical outcomes and surgical approaches remain subjects of ongoing evaluation.

aimsTo evaluate the indications, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes of pediatric pulmonary resections. STUDY

designA retrospective, single-center case series.

methodsMedical records of 41 pulmonary resection procedures performed in pediatric patients were reviewed retrospectively. Data on demographic characteristics, type of resection, laterality, pathological diagnoses, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

resultsWedge resection was the most frequently performed procedure (75.6%), while bullous emphysema was the most common pathological diagnosis (51.2%). Of all resection procedures, 86.1% were associated with benign and 13.9% with malignant conditions. No major postoperative complications and no 90-day mortality were documented in the reviewed records. During follow-up, three patients died, all of whom had malignant diagnoses.

conclusionIn this retrospective single-center mixed-pathology case series, pediatric pulmonary resections were associated with favorable observed perioperative outcomes, with no documented major postoperative complications or 90-day mortality. Operative strategy was individualized according to lesion type, extent, and surgical feasibility, while follow-up deaths were confined to patients with malignant diagnoses.

Indexed as

ChildLung diseasesThoracic surgeryThoracoscopyTreatment outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.