ReviewMusculoskeletal surgery2026
Total knee arthroplasty alignment strategies and their impact on ankle and hindfoot: a systematic review.
Review in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple alignment strategies have been proposed in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), ranging from systematic approaches such as mechanical alignment and anatomical alignment to personalized techniques including kinematic, restricted kinematic, inverse kinematic, and functional alignment. Although previous studies and reviews have evaluated the relationship between TKA and distal alignment, the influence of different knee alignment strategies on ankle and hindfoot alignment remains less clearly defined. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of TKA alignment strategies on postoperative ankle and hindfoot alignment. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Medline (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies evaluating preoperative and postoperative ankle and/or hindfoot alignment following TKA. Eligible studies included clinical investigations reporting radiographic measurements of the ankle or hindfoot and clearly defining the TKA alignment strategy adopted. Study design, level of evidence, patient demographics, alignment technique, radiographic parameters, and functional outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Twenty-two studies were included, most of which provided level III evidence. Sixteen studies evaluated mechanically aligned TKA only, five compared mechanical alignment with personalized or alternative alignment strategies, and one investigated a personalized alignment strategy without direct comparison. Mechanical alignment consistently corrected coronal knee malalignment, particularly varus knee deformity, but distal ankle and hindfoot adaptations were variable. These changes appeared to be influenced by the severity of preoperative varus deformity, subtalar joint flexibility, and the presence of ankle osteoarthritis. Residual hindfoot valgus and incomplete distal compensation were frequently reported, especially in patients with severe preoperative varus knee deformity. Mechanical alignment reliably corrects coronal knee alignment, but ankle and hindfoot responses are variable and may remain incomplete in patients with severe varus deformity, ankle osteoarthritis, or limited subtalar compensation. Selected studies suggest that personalized alignment strategies may reduce compensatory distal changes, but the available evidence is limited and heterogeneous. Further comparative studies with standardized ankle and hindfoot assessment are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42258121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.