ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
Knowledge-based treatment planning in breast cancer radiotherapy: comparing different machine learning algorithms.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knowledge-based planning (KBP) has emerged as a promising approach to improve the consistency and efficiency of radiotherapy by utilizing prior clinical data to guide treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting key dosimetric parameters in 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) of left-sided breast cancer, with the goal of reducing manual trial-and-error during plan optimization. A retrospective dataset of 75 breast cancer patients treated with 3D-CRT was used. Geometric and dosimetric features, including beam and organ-at-risk (OAR) parameters, were extracted from clinically approved plans. Ten supervised regression algorithms, including SVR, LASSO, Ridge, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting Regressor, Histogram-Based Gradient Boosting, KNN, MLP, SGD, and Kernel Ridge Regression, were trained to predict dosimetric outcomes such as D_mean and V_x for the heart and lung, and homogeneity index (HI). Data preprocessing included outlier capping, quantile-based oversampling, and MaxAbs scaling. Model performance was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation and an independent test set, employing RMSE, MAPE, and MedAE as metrics. Among the evaluated algorithms, the KNN model demonstrated the consistent predictive performance across all dosimetric endpoints, achieving the lowest RMSE and MAPE for D_mean Heart (2.09 Gy, 0.17) and D_mean Lung (3.12 Gy, 0.15). Feature importance analysis identified geometric parameters such as borders, wedge angles, and OAR volumes as the most influential predictors. ML-based KBP can accurately predict dosimetric outcomes prior to dose calculation, improving planning efficiency and consistency in breast 3D-CRT. The KNN algorithm showed the highest reliability, suggesting its suitability for integration into clinical decision-support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42258103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.