ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Implementing Temporary Financial Assistance for Homelessness Prevention: a CFIR-Guided Study of Provider Perspectives.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Housing insecurity is a growing public health concern with significant implications for efforts to prevent homelessness. Temporary financial assistance (TFA) is an upstream intervention designed to prevent homelessness by addressing urgent housing needs through flexible, short-term financial support. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study examined providers' perspectives on implementing TFA across nine Arizona organizations and explored how these determinants may inform the selection and measurement of implementation outcomes. Thirty-six participants participated in interviews or focus groups to share their experiences implementing TFA. Using deductive thematic analysis, findings highlight key internal and external barriers such as complex eligibility criteria, administrative burdens, and limited affordable housing that may have affected the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of TFA delivery. Facilitators included provider training, cross-sector partnerships, and strong vendor relationships that improved adoption and integration of TFA across service settings. Providers used a range of implementation strategies, including reimbursement systems, promise-to-pay arrangements, and tiered intake processes, to overcome systemic barriers and promote recipients' housing stability. Although funding constraints and contextual challenges limited sustainment, providers demonstrated a strong commitment to adapting implementation approaches to meet recipient needs. This study contributes to the growing evidence based on the practical application of implementation science in homelessness prevention, offering insights into how determinants of implementation can strengthen intervention delivery in diverse settings. Findings inform policy, research, and practice aimed at optimizing implementation outcomes for homelessness prevention interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42258066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.