Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42258021›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

New methodological and software tools for probing moderation in intrinsically nonlinear models.

Haley E Yaremych, Kristopher J Preacher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haley E YaremychDepartment of Psychology & Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. haley.yaremych@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5963-0758
Kristopher J PreacherDepartment of Psychology & Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When modeling psychological processes and relationships, intrinsically nonlinear models often enhance researchers' ability to draw useful theoretical and substantive conclusions. In addition, psychological theories frequently suggest that such processes and relationships are moderated; therefore, it is often important to test for, probe, and plot moderation. However, extant methods for assessing and visualizing moderation are largely restricted to linear models. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to develop novel analytical and software tools that enable researchers to specify and examine moderated parameters within intrinsically nonlinear models. First, methods for testing, plotting, and probing moderation are expanded in novel ways for use in nonlinear models; specifically, we present conceptual and mathematical extensions of the Johnson-Neyman (JN) technique. The JN technique is currently used to probe moderation of simple slopes within the linear modeling framework; our extensions enable its application to any moderated parameter of an intrinsically nonlinear model. Additionally, we introduce a Shiny application called CurveBuilder, which unifies the process of choosing, specifying, fitting, and visualizing intrinsically nonlinear models that may include moderated parameters and/or random effects. The application provides a code-free environment for users to complete all steps of the analysis process, including uploading data, visually choosing start values, specifying models, plotting results, and probing moderation with the extended JN technique. CurveBuilder examples are reviewed, and opportunities for future work in this area are discussed.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalNonlinear DynamicsSoftwareHumansInteractionIntrinsically nonlinear modelsJohnson-Neyman techniqueModerationNonlinear modelsShiny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.