ArticleBehavior research methods2026
New methodological and software tools for probing moderation in intrinsically nonlinear models.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When modeling psychological processes and relationships, intrinsically nonlinear models often enhance researchers' ability to draw useful theoretical and substantive conclusions. In addition, psychological theories frequently suggest that such processes and relationships are moderated; therefore, it is often important to test for, probe, and plot moderation. However, extant methods for assessing and visualizing moderation are largely restricted to linear models. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to develop novel analytical and software tools that enable researchers to specify and examine moderated parameters within intrinsically nonlinear models. First, methods for testing, plotting, and probing moderation are expanded in novel ways for use in nonlinear models; specifically, we present conceptual and mathematical extensions of the Johnson-Neyman (JN) technique. The JN technique is currently used to probe moderation of simple slopes within the linear modeling framework; our extensions enable its application to any moderated parameter of an intrinsically nonlinear model. Additionally, we introduce a Shiny application called CurveBuilder, which unifies the process of choosing, specifying, fitting, and visualizing intrinsically nonlinear models that may include moderated parameters and/or random effects. The application provides a code-free environment for users to complete all steps of the analysis process, including uploading data, visually choosing start values, specifying models, plotting results, and probing moderation with the extended JN technique. CurveBuilder examples are reviewed, and opportunities for future work in this area are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42258021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.