ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Design and evaluation of an intuitive distal-flexible endoscope for constrained surgical environments.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive surgery is increasingly applied to complex procedures; however, conventional endoscopes are limited by restricted maneuverability and unintuitive control, often leading to frequent endoscope adjustments and suboptimal visualization in anatomically constrained spaces.
methodsWe developed a distal-flexible endoscopic system with an intuitive control strategy inspired by human cervical-trunk coordination. The system enables decoupled rotational and translational movements and incorporates head-motion-based control using a HoloLens interface to facilitate natural endoscope navigation. The system was evaluated through benchtop accuracy tests, a simulated surgical task, and in vivo experiments.
resultsThe prototype system demonstrated high positioning accuracy and precise motion control, with sub-millimeter translational and low angular errors. Compared with a conventional semi-rigid endoscope, it significantly reduced external workspace occupation while maintaining full visualization of key thoracic anatomical structures in both phantom and animal studies. In the simulated surgical task, the system reduced operative time (5.8 vs. 4.6 min, p = 0.042) and operator workload (lower NASA-TLX scores across all subscales). In vivo experiments further showed shorter operative time (40.2 vs. 51.0 min, p = 0.046) and fewer endoscope repositionings (4.8 vs. 12.8, p = 0.004), with comparable safety outcomes.
conclusionThe prototype endoscopic system improves procedural efficiency and reduces operator workload while maintaining comparable safety outcomes, providing preliminary evidence of its clinical feasibility. This approach may offer a promising solution for intuitive and efficient visualization in minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42257972What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.