ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Autologous platelet-rich fibrin matrix (Obsidian RFT) as a sphincter-preserving treatment for anal fistula: a retrospective cohort study and subgroup analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe treatment of anal fistula remains a delicate balance between achieving healing and preserving anal continence. Sphincter-preserving strategies, such as autologous platelet-rich plasma/fibrin (PRP/PRF) matrices, offer a regenerative approach with minimal morbidity. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a specific autologous fibrin matrix system (Obsidian RFT) in the management of anal fistula and to identify predictors of treatment success.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated with the Obsidian RFT system for anal fistula at a single institution between January 2020 and September 2025. The primary endpoint was fistula healing, defined as the complete cessation of drainage and closure of the external opening. Secondary endpoints included secondary healing (after a simple adjunctive procedure), overall final healing (after any reintervention), and postoperative fecal incontinence (Wexner score). A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes in "ideal candidates" (single-tract, non-supralevator fistulas, no associated abscess).
resultsA total of 86 patients were included (mean age 52.4 ± 14.4 years; 64% male). The majority of fistulas were transsphincteric (96.5%). The median follow-up was 8.7 months. Primary healing was achieved in 45.3% of patients (39/86) after the first application. With the addition of a simple secondary procedure (repeat matrix application or limited fistulotomy), the secondary healing rate increased to 58.1% (50/86). Overall final healing, including patients requiring complex reinterventions, reached 64.0% (55/86). Persistence accounted for most failures, while true late recurrence was uncommon. Postoperative fecal incontinence was rare, occurring in only 2.3% of patients. In the "ideal patient" subgroup, primary healing was significantly higher (51.4%) compared to non-ideal candidates (18.8%; p = 0.018), rising to 65.7% with reintervention (p = 0.003).
conclusionThe Obsidian RFT system is a safe, sphincter-preserving option associated with minimal morbidity and negligible impact on continence. While primary healing rates are modest, the cumulative success rate significantly increases with a sequential approach, validating its use as a "staged" strategy. This modality serves as a valuable first-line treatment in a stepped-care algorithm to minimize incontinence risk before escalating to more invasive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42257963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.