ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Prediction of venous thromboembolism after metabolic and bariatric surgery using machine learning approach: a MBSAQIP study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have developed predictive models for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), but none have incorporated complications that increase VTE risk. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for VTE following MBS using machine learning (ML) algorithms, using models that either excluded or included time-aware postoperative complication variables-these were engineered to include only complications that occurred before the VTE event.
methodsWe used the MBSAQIP database from 2020 to 2023. XGBoost, random forest classifiers, support vector machines (SVMs), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and logistic regression models were used to predict VTE after MBS in models with and without considering other postoperative complications that occurred before VTE occurrence.
resultsThe study included 2198 and 698,284 VTE and non-VTE cases, respectively. For models excluding complications, the area under the curve (AUC) values were as follows: XGBoost (0.668), RandomForestClassifier (0.660), SVM (0.649), ANN (0.657), and logistic regression (0.669). Including time-adjusted complications improved all model performances, with AUCs of XGBoost (0.680), RandomForestClassifier (0.664), SVM (0.666), ANN (0.697), and logistic regression (0.690). The strongest postoperative predictor of VTE was the need for reoperation. Other postoperative predictors included prolonged length of stay, ICU admission, reintervention, organ-space surgical site infection, sepsis, and anastomotic leak.
conclusionPostoperative complications and prolonged length of stay were strongly associated with VTE after MBS, suggesting that patients with these risk factors may benefit from enhanced prophylactic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42257956What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.