ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Early clinical impact of mesenteric Kocherization in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) offers several technical advantages, prolonged operative time remains a major clinical challenge. Mesenteric Kocherization (MK) has recently been introduced as a technical modification for mobilizing the duodenum and pancreatic head during RPD. The present study evaluated the early clinical impact of MK on operative efficiency and perioperative outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 56 consecutive patients who underwent totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy between July 2021 and June 2025. Conventional Kocherization (CK) was performed in 36 patients and MK in 20 patients. The primary outcome was total operative time. Secondary outcomes included console time, Kocherization time, estimated blood loss, transfusion, harvested lymph nodes, R0 resection rate, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa), time to first oral intake, and 90-day unplanned readmission rate. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching was performed using a 1:2 allocation (MK:CK).
resultsIn the full cohort, operative time tended to be shorter in the MK group than in the CK group (560 [516-598] vs. 592 [556-667] min; p = 0.057). Kocherization time was significantly shorter with MK (28 [27-36] vs. 50 [40-58] min; p < 0.001), while estimated blood loss was comparable (p = 0.875). After propensity score matching (MK n = 11; CK n = 22), MK was associated with significantly shorter total operative time (533 [511-575] vs. 580 [557-611] min; p = 0.031) and Kocherization time (28 [24-30] vs. 49 [43-55] min; p < 0.001). Blood loss, R0 resection rate, and major postoperative complications were comparable between groups.
conclusionsMesenteric Kocherization was associated with improved operative efficiency in RPD, primarily through shortening the resection phase of the procedure while maintaining perioperative safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42257944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.