ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Quadruple reinforcement technique for pancreatic stump during robotic distal pancreatectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant challenge in robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). We developed a novel "quadruple reinforcement technique" to mitigate this risk and evaluated its clinical efficacy compared to conventional techniques.
methodsIn this prospective study of 44 consecutive RDP patients (March 2020-September 2025), outcomes were compared between a quadruple reinforcement group (n = 27) and a control group (n = 17). The reinforcement technique involved: (1) staple line reinforcement; (2) absorbable reinforcement felt; (3) U-shaped sutures using a 3-0 non-absorbable double-armed monofilament; and (4) sprayed fibrin sealant. Clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) was defined per 2016 ISGPS criteria.
resultsPancreatic texture was comparable between the groups. The quadruple reinforcement group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of CR-POPF (3.7% vs. 41.2%, P = 0.002) and fewer complications ≥ Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa (0% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.004) compared to controls. Median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the reinforcement group (5.0 vs. 7.0 days, P = 0.007). There were no 30-day reoperations or 90-day mortalities in either group.
conclusionsThe quadruple reinforcement technique is a safe and feasible strategy that significantly reduces CR-POPF and major complications. This systematic combination effectively optimizes postoperative outcomes in RDP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.