ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Endoshare: a publicly available, surgeons-friendly solution to de-identify and manage surgical videos.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVideo-based assessment and surgical data science can advance surgical training, research, and quality improvement. However, widespread use of surgical videos is limited by heterogeneous recording formats and privacy concerns associated with sharing potentially sensitive data. The work presents the development, implementation, evaluation, and public release of Endoshare, a surgeon-friendly application that merges, standardizes, and de-identifies endoscopic videos.
methodsDevelopment followed the first four phases of the software development life cycle (analysis, design, implementation, testing), using iterative user-centered evaluations to guide system refinement. In the initial analysis phase, an internal survey of clinicians and computer scientists, using 10 usability heuristics, identified early requirements. These findings guided design and implementation toward a cross-platform, privacy-by-design architecture. In the final testing phase, an external clinician survey combined the same heuristics with Technology Acceptance Model constructs to evaluate usability and adoption, complemented by a performance assessment across different hardware and configurations. Statistical evaluation used standard descriptive and inferential methods.
resultsIn the analysis phase, four clinicians and four computer scientists tested a prototype, reporting high usability (4.68 ± 0.40/5 and 4.03 ± 0.51/5). The lowest score (4.00 ± 0.93/5) concerned the clarity of labels, indicating a need to make functions easier to recognize. The application's user experience was refined to ensure minimal effort for case selection, video merging, automated out-of-body detection and removal, and filename pseudonymization. In the testing phase, 10 surgeons reported high perceived usefulness (5.07 ± 1.75/7), ease of use (5.15 ± 1.71/7), heuristic usability (4.38 ± 0.48/5), and recommended the system (9.20 ± 0.79/10). Benchmarking showed that processing time increased proportionally with video duration and was consistently lower in fast mode (≈ 79% faster).
conclusionEndoshare is a publicly available surgeon-friendly solution to manage, standardize, and de-identify surgical videos. Endoshare could facilitate the use and sharing of valuable surgical video data for surgical training, research, and quality improvement. Compliance certification and broader interoperability validation are needed to establish it as a reliable tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42257929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.