Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2026
Taxing working memory during laparoscopic training: reducing the impact of perfectionistic concerns on skill learning.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerfectionistic concerns are common among surgeons and have been linked to reduced learning gains in the acquisition of basic instrument-handling skills for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). These concerns often trigger rumination, which distracts attention from the task at hand during practice and interferes with effective skill acquisition. According to working-memory models, occupying task-irrelevant capacity with a neutral secondary task may leave fewer resources available for rumination, thereby reducing negative self-focus. This study investigated whether adding a secondary working-memory task during MIS training alters the association between self-critical perfectionism and laparoscopic skill retention.
methodsIn this randomized experimental study, 55 laparoscopically naïve participants practiced a peg-transfer task on a custom MIS simulator and returned within 48 h for a retention test. Participants were allocated to a control condition wherein the target position for the pegs were continuously visible, or an experimental condition in which targets were visible for one second only, imposing visuospatial working-memory load. Performance was measured by completion time and instrument path length. Perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns were measured with the Big Three Perfectionism Scale. Retention was measured as the regression slope between late-practice and retention performance, wherein more negative slopes reflect better retention.
resultsPractice performance and retention test performance did not differ between conditions. Perfectionistic strivings were not associated with skill retention in either group. In the control condition, higher perfectionistic concerns significantly predicted reduced retention of movement efficiency, though completion time was unaffected. Conversely, under working-memory load, perfectionistic concerns did not predict retention for either outcome.
conclusionsImposing a visuospatial working memory load during MIS practice did not compromise performance, and the observed pattern is consistent with reduced vulnerability to perfectionistic concerns in movement-efficiency retention. While these initial patterns are promising, future studies are required to definitively establish the effectiveness of these training constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.