ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Comparative evaluation of bipolar versus monopolar energy platforms in G-POEM for gastroparesis: technical performance, learning curves, and clinical outcomes.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) is an established treatment for medically refractory gastroparesis, traditionally performed using monopolar electrosurgical platforms. A novel bipolar energy device integrates cutting and coagulation into a single instrument and may streamline submucosal tunneling procedures. While feasibility has been demonstrated, direct comparisons between bipolar and monopolar energy platforms are lacking. This study aimed to compare technical performance, learning curves, perioperative metrics, and clinical outcomes between these two platforms in G-POEM.
methodsPatients undergoing G-POEM using either a bipolar energy platform (Speedboat knife, SBK) or a monopolar energy platform (Triangle-tip knife, TTK) between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes included technical success, operative time, and learning curve inflection points based on operative efficiency. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, symptom resolution, postoperative Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) scores, and gastric emptying scintigraphy results.
resultsA total of 111 patients were included (SBK: 23; TTK: 88). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Technical success was achieved in 95.7% of SBK and 100% of TTK cases (p = 0.207). One SBK case required conversion to TTK. Learning curve analysis showed inflection points at 7 procedures for SBK and 8 for TTK, based on operative time reduction (SBK: 98.0 vs 60.1 min, p = 0.001; TTK: 83.3 vs 63.1 min, p = 0.005). Median operative time, hospital stay, and 30- and 90-day readmission rates were comparable between groups (all p > 0.05). No leaks or perforations occurred. At a mean follow-up of 13.4 (10) months, there were no differences in predominant symptom resolution (p = 1.000), postoperative GCSI scores (p = 0.985), or GCSI subdomain scores (all p > 0.05). Improvement in gastric emptying scintigraphy was also similar (p = 0.410). Follow-up duration was comparable (p = 0.303).
conclusionBipolar energy platforms demonstrated comparable technical success, learning curves, and clinical outcomes to monopolar energy platforms for G-POEM. Bipolar energy may serve as a safe and effective alternative for endoscopic pyloromyotomy in patients with medically refractory gastroparesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.