Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42257882›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2026

Patient blood management in general intensive care patients.

Patrick Meybohm, David M Baron, Dietmar Fries, Sigismond Lasocki, Alexander P J Vlaar, Kai Zacharowski, Suma Choorapoikayil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick MeybohmDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. meybohm_p@ukw.de.
David M BaronClinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dietmar FriesDivision of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Zams, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sigismond LasockiNetwork for the Advancement of Patient Blood Management, Haemostasis and Thrombosis (NATA), Brussels, Belgium.
Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kai ZacharowskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Suma ChoorapoikayilDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0817-3371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCritically ill and high-risk perioperative patients requiring intensive care are often multimorbid and depend on rapid, highly specialized management. While most comorbidities are difficult to modify in the acute setting, anemia, particularly iron-defi ciency anemia, represents a potentially modifiable risk factor. Clinicians are also often confronted with complex alterations in hemostasis that require rapid assessment and targeted therapeutic interventions, including the optimal use of blood products. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on Patient Blood Management strategies, including anemia management, the use of small-volume tubes, and the appropriate use of blood products in intensive care unit patients.

resultsIntravenous iron supplementation can safely raise hemoglobin to a clinically meaningful degree. Erythropoietin therapy may also raise hemoglobin, but its use should remain selective given uncertain thromboembolic risk. Small-volume blood collection tubes and closed blood-conservation systems should be routinely used to reduce iatrogenic anemia. Current evidence supports restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in most clinical settings, particularly in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Similarly, a restrictive platelet transfusion strategy is supported by current evidence. Prophylactic platelet transfusion should be reserved for high-risk hematologic malignancies. In other critically ill patients with severe thrombocytopenia, a therapeutic (bleeding-driven) approach is preferred. Finally, current evidence does not support prophylactic fresh frozen plasma transfusion in non-bleeding patients.

conclusionsOverall, these findings support the implementation of Patient Blood Management strategies that optimize blood health and promote safer, more individualized care in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

AnemiaBlood TransfusionCritical CareCritical IllnessErythropoietinHumansIntensive Care UnitsPlatelet TransfusionErythropoietinBlood healthCoagulopathyFresh frozen plasmaIron deficiencyPlateletsSafety

Identifiers

PMID42257882
PMCPMC13269305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.