ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Patient blood management in general intensive care patients.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCritically ill and high-risk perioperative patients requiring intensive care are often multimorbid and depend on rapid, highly specialized management. While most comorbidities are difficult to modify in the acute setting, anemia, particularly iron-defi ciency anemia, represents a potentially modifiable risk factor. Clinicians are also often confronted with complex alterations in hemostasis that require rapid assessment and targeted therapeutic interventions, including the optimal use of blood products. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on Patient Blood Management strategies, including anemia management, the use of small-volume tubes, and the appropriate use of blood products in intensive care unit patients.
resultsIntravenous iron supplementation can safely raise hemoglobin to a clinically meaningful degree. Erythropoietin therapy may also raise hemoglobin, but its use should remain selective given uncertain thromboembolic risk. Small-volume blood collection tubes and closed blood-conservation systems should be routinely used to reduce iatrogenic anemia. Current evidence supports restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in most clinical settings, particularly in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Similarly, a restrictive platelet transfusion strategy is supported by current evidence. Prophylactic platelet transfusion should be reserved for high-risk hematologic malignancies. In other critically ill patients with severe thrombocytopenia, a therapeutic (bleeding-driven) approach is preferred. Finally, current evidence does not support prophylactic fresh frozen plasma transfusion in non-bleeding patients.
conclusionsOverall, these findings support the implementation of Patient Blood Management strategies that optimize blood health and promote safer, more individualized care in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.