ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Is acute respiratory distress syndrome a preventable disease?
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSixty years after its initial description, the epidemiology and pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have evolved substantially. This narrative review examines whether ARDS is a preventable disease, evaluating the evidence for successful prevention of iatrogenic phenotypes and the challenges that remain for noniatrogenic causes.
methodsWe reviewed the published literature on ARDS prevention, including evidence from clinical trials, population-based epidemiologic studies, implementation research, and biological subphenotyping studies, synthesized through the framework of the multiple hit hypothesis.
resultsFor iatrogenic phenotypes, ARDS prevention has substantially succeeded. Transfusion-related acute lung injury has declined dramatically following male-predominant plasma policies. Lung-protective ventilation initiated in emergency departments and operating rooms has reduced both ARDS incidence and mortality. Bundled care approaches combining restrictive fluid and transfusion strategies, aspiration precautions, and early antimicrobials have further reduced iatrogenic lung injury. What remains under the ARDS label is an increasingly heterogeneous collection of conditions driven by upstream host-pathogen interactions and biological phenotype. Pharmacologic prevention trials in unselected populations have been consistently disappointing, likely because biologically distinct subphenotypes respond differently to treatment. Additionally, the population-attributable fraction of death from ARDS is modest, suggesting that even successful prevention may not translate into proportional mortality reduction.
conclusionExtending prevention beyond iatrogenic causes will require precision approaches: phenotype-targeted pharmacotherapy, individualized mechanical ventilation, and systematic implementation of evidence-based practices across the care continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42257879What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.