ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Predicting orchiectomy in testicular torsion using hybrid machine learning and explainable AI: a web-based clinical decision support system.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a high-accuracy prediction model using hybrid machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques for distinguishing between orchiectomy and detorsion in testicular torsion (TT), and to create an interactive web application and nomogram for clinical use. MATERIALS AND
methodsData from 117 patients who underwent surgical treatment for TT at our clinic between January 2005 and June 2025 were retrospectively analyzed (detorsion: 83, orchiectomy: 34). From twenty initial features, seven optimal features were selected using a hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization-Grey Wolf Optimization (PSO-GWO) algorithm. Class imbalance was addressed using SVMSMOTE. Four ensemble learning algorithms were compared, and CatBoost was selected as the final model. SHAP, LIME, Partial Dependence Plot (PDP), and Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) analyses were performed for model interpretability. A seven-feature nomogram was developed using logistic regression. A two-module web application was created using Python Dash.
resultsPSO-GWO identified seven optimal features (Age, Symptom Duration, PDW, PCT, MPV, MLR, SII). CatBoost demonstrated the highest performance (AUC: 0.923, Accuracy: 89.5%). XAI analyses identified symptom duration as the strongest predictor (SHAP: 52.72%), followed by MLR (14.24%) and PDW (12.09%). PDW emerged as a novel biomarker with minimal prior investigation in the literature yet demonstrated strong discriminatory power (inverse relationship, cut-off < 17.9 fL). PDP analysis revealed a distinct inflection point at approximately 7 h, corroborating the ROC cut-off values. ICE analysis revealed substantial individual heterogeneity (score > 0.36). The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination (AUC: 0.818) and excellent calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.556). A simplified three-feature risk scoring system (0-3 points) was developed. The web application (medicalinformaticsttrc.adiyaman.edu.tr) provided real-time risk calculation (< 50 ms).
conclusionThe CatBoost model developed with hybrid PSO-GWO algorithm and XAI techniques achieved high accuracy in predicting orchiectomy in TT. PDW was identified as a novel, practical, and cost-effective biomarker. The developed web application and risk scoring system may support preoperative counseling, surgical preparedness, and clinical decision-making in the emergency department. The "detorsion" outcome indicates intraoperative non-removal of the testis and does not confirm long-term testicular viability. This exploratory model requires external validation and multicenter prospective studies before clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.