ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Development of a machine learning model using systemic and ophthalmic parameters to detect sleep-disordered breathing in glaucoma patients.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a machine-learning model using systemic and ophthalmic parameters that predicts sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). STUDY
designRetrospective cross-sectional study
methodsWe analyzed 513 patients with OAG (955 eyes) treated at Seiryo Eye Clinic. All the participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including Humphrey visual field (HVF) testing, and home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) to obtain the 4% oxygen desaturation index (ODI). SDB was operationally defined as ODI-SAS, ie, sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) defined by HSAT-derived 4% ODI ≥15 events per hour. Sixteen algorithms were trained to predict ODI-SAS; model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), precision, recall, the F1 score, and the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).
resultsOne hundred fifty-eight patients (30.80%) met the ODI-SAS criterion. ODI-SAS status was associated with a history of hypertension, higher body mass index, family-reported apnea, shorter axial length, fewer antiglaucoma medications, and worse inferocentral total deviation on HVF (all P < 0.05), but not with self-awareness of snoring or previous SAS diagnosis. A gradient-boosted decision-tree model (CatBoost) achieved the best performance (ROC-AUC 0.86), with precision 0.692, recall 0.711, F1 score 0.701, and MCC 0.543.
conclusionMachine-learning models can predict ODI-SAS in glaucoma using systemic risk factors together with ophthalmic features, including inferocentral visual-field defects. Such models may help identify OAG patients who warrant formal sleep evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.