Observational studyBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Risk of malignancy after diagnosis of radial sclerosing lesion without atypia.
Observational study in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSurgical excision of radial sclerosing lesions (RSLs) has historically been recommended to rule out malignancy. Contemporary guidelines support imaging surveillance instead whenever these lesions are "adequately sampled." However, uncertainty exists around what suffices for sampling prior to observation, and the outcomes of imaging surveillance.
methodsWe conducted an observational cohort study including all RSLs diagnosed on image-guided needle biopsy performed at our institution from 2020 to 2025. We excluded lesions with a concurrent diagnosis of invasive cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or epithelial atypia in the ipsilateral breast. For lesions that underwent repeat percutaneous biopsy or surgical excision, we estimated the probability that additional sampling revealed malignancy. For the entire population, whether excision was performed or not, we estimated the cumulative incidence of malignancy at the site of RSL during follow-up.
resultsA total of 419 RSLs were diagnosed in 390 patients. 262 (62.5%) lesions were diagnosed by stereotactic-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB), 100 (23.9%) by MRI-guided VAB, and 57 (13.6%) by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. During initial work-up or follow-up, 35 lesions underwent repeat image-guided biopsy and 28 underwent surgical excision. None of these additional sampling procedures revealed malignancy. The estimated 3-year cumulative incidence of malignancy at the RSL site was 0% (95% CI: 0, 2.0%).
conclusionsThese findings support a management strategy of imaging surveillance when radiologic-pathologic concordance is established. Even for less extensively sampled lesions, routine repeat biopsy or surgical excision may not be necessary for RSLs without atypia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.