ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Evidence from intra-patient progression indicates adenoid ameloblastoma as a phenotypic variant of dentinogenic ghost cell tumor.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adenoid ameloblastoma (AA) and dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT) show marked morphologic and molecular overlap but remain classified as distinct odontogenic entities largely on the basis of architectural predominance. We studied 3 patients with ghost cell odontogenic lesions who underwent sequential resections, permitting longitudinal intra-patient analysis of progression from calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC) or DGCT to ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC). Adenomatoid differentiation and ghost cell/dentinoid components were quantitatively assessed across stages. Immunohistochemistry for β-catenin, BRAF V600E, and Ki-67 and Sanger sequencing of CTNNB1 exon 3 were performed. All cases showed marked architectural plasticity, with dynamic shifts in adenomatoid and ghost cell/dentinoid proportions during recurrence and malignant transformation. By contrast, molecular findings remained stable within each patient. Nuclear β-catenin accumulation persisted at all stages, BRAF V600E was uniformly negative, and proliferative activity increased with transformation to GCOC. These findings provide longitudinal evidence that architectural predominance in ghost cell odontogenic lesions is dynamic rather than fixed and support the interpretation that AA may represent an adenomatoid-predominant phenotype within the DGCT spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42257710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.