Observational studyScience progress
Real-world pharmacovigilance of adverse events associated with immune checkpoint and targeted inhibitors in digestive system tumors: A FAERS database study.
Observational study in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveDigestive system tumors (DST) remain a major contributor to the global cancer burden. This study aimed to characterize the adverse events (AEs) spectrum, identify potential safety signals, and explore subgroup-specific reporting patterns and time-to-onset features of immune checkpoint and targeted inhibitors in DST using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).MethodsThis was a retrospective observational pharmacovigilance study based on spontaneous reports submitted to FAERS from 2004Q1 to 2024Q4. The study population comprised FAERS reports involving patients with DST who received PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, HER2, EGFR, VEGF, or VEGFR inhibitors. Reports were retrieved through OpenVigil 2.1 and coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms. After data cleaning, disproportionality analyses were performed using the reporting odds ratio and information component, with signal thresholds defined as ROR025 >1, IC025 >0, and at least three reports. Descriptive analyses, temporal trend analyses, subgroup analyses, and Weibull time-to-onset analyses were also conducted.ResultsA total of 41,168 eligible reports were included. Most reports involved male patients and individuals weighing 50-100 kg. VEGFR inhibitors accounted for the largest number of AE reports, whereas CTLA-4 inhibitors accounted for the fewest. Reporting trends generally increased over time, although fluctuations were observed across drug classes. At the preferred-term level, 131, 372, 38, 114, 274, 382, and 320 valid safety signals were identified for PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, HER2, EGFR, VEGF, and VEGFR inhibitors, respectively. Frequently detected signals included disease progression, off-label use, and death. Stratified analyses suggested age- and sex-related differences in the reporting patterns of selected AEs across drug classes. Time-to-onset analysis showed an early-failure pattern for all investigated inhibitors, with the hazard of AE occurrence decreasing over time.ConclusionsThis FAERS-based retrospective pharmacovigilance study comprehensively characterized the AE reporting profiles of immune checkpoint and targeted inhibitors in DST. Multiple potential safety signals, subgroup-specific reporting patterns, and early-onset AE features were identified. These findings may support clinical risk monitoring, pharmacovigilance surveillance, and individualized safety assessment in patients with DST receiving immune checkpoint or targeted inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.