ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Tumor-Specific Success Probabilities and Factors Associated With Phase III Trials in Oncology Drug Development.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in novel therapeutic modalities, such as molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies, the probability of success in Phase III oncology trials remains low. This study quantitatively characterized success probabilities of Phase III trials in oncology drug development and evaluated the factors associated with trial success. Phase III interventional oncology drug trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2023 with publicly available primary endpoint results were included. Trial success was defined as the achievement of at least one primary endpoint, and tumor-specific success probabilities were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between trial success and key trial characteristics. We analyzed 824 trials (358 successful and 466 unsuccessful). Overall success probabilities were comparable between solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, although substantial heterogeneity was observed across solid tumors, with particularly low success probabilities for central nervous system tumors and pancreatic cancer. Multivariable analyses showed that biomarker-based patient selection, more recently initiated trials, line of therapy, and the number of primary endpoints were associated with trial success. Trials evaluating molecularly targeted therapies and those with short-term evaluable endpoints showed higher success probabilities, whereas trials evaluating chemotherapy or assessing overall or event-free survival endpoints showed lower success probabilities. Phase III trial success in oncology is associated with tumor-specific characteristics and development-stage factors, including biomarker-based patient selection and trial design. These results provide quantitative evidence to inform decision-making and trial design in oncology drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.