Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2026
Progression to Wheelchair in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and Impact of Siponimod: Post Hoc Analyses From the EXPAND Study.
Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progression to Wheelchair in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and Impact of Siponimod: Post Hoc Analyses From the EXPAND Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDelaying time to requiring a wheelchair in people living with MS is an important treatment goal to maintain quality of life and guard against increased healthcare costs. In this post hoc analysis, the effects of siponimod versus placebo on time to sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ≥ 7.0 over the core part of the Phase 3 EXPAND study were assessed.
methodsThe time to sustained EDSS ≥ 7.0 (time to requiring a wheelchair) was analysed for participants with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Analyses were based on a While on Treatment (WOT) set that censored participants if entering open-label treatment. Subgroup analyses were conducted in participants with active versus non-active SPMS (defined based on pre-study/baseline criteria), and in participants with baseline EDSS 6.5.
resultsIn the overall EXPAND population, siponimod reduced the risk of reaching sustained EDSS ≥ 7.0 (requiring a wheelchair) by 40% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.88; p = 0.009) versus placebo; the reduction in risk was 51% (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; p = 0.005) versus placebo in participants with active SPMS and 22% (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.42-1.45; p = 0.437) in non-active SPMS.
conclusionSiponimod reduced the risk of requiring a wheelchair in participants with SPMS versus participants receiving placebo, with a greater effect in those with active disease. Time to requiring a wheelchair is a highly relevant treatment goal and an important indicator of treatment effect in patients with SPMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.