ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Assessment of Deep Learning-Generated Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography From Fundus Images in Diabetic Retinopathy.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the clinical validity of synthetic ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA) images generated from ultra-widefield fundus photography (UWFP) using generative adversarial networks (GANs) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: Two GAN-based models, RegGAN and UWAFA-GAN, were trained to generate synthetic UWFA images from corresponding UWFP acquired using Optos California P200DTx. The dataset included 2084 image pairs (no DR: 124; nonproliferative DR: 795; severe NPDR: 770; proliferative DR: 395). Technical image similarity was assessed using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM). Clinical similarity was assessed by expert graders using the DR severity scale, comparing the synthetic images with corresponding real UWFA images. Results: Both models demonstrated acceptable performance in generating synthetic UWFA images from UWFP (F1-score range: 0.281-0.709; SSIM: 0.43-0.585; PSNR: 18.15-19.90). UWAFA-GAN achieved higher quantitative similarity metrics (SSIM and PSNR), indicating superior overall image fidelity, whereas RegGAN showed stronger clinical correlation with ground-truth UWFA, achieving higher diagnostic accuracy (66.7% vs. 49.2%) and more balanced precision, recall, and F1-scores across DR severity levels. This suggests that while UWAFA-GAN excels in pixel-level resemblance, RegGAN better preserves diagnostically relevant features. Conclusions: GAN models successfully generated UWFA images from UWFP in patients with DR. With further improvements, such models may serve as a complementary noninvasive imaging tool in selected clinical settings and may extend accessibility in resource-limiting settings. Translational Relevance: GAN-based synthetic angiography may serve as a noninvasive alternative to UWFA, particularly when conventional angiography is contraindicated or unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.