ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Evaluation of radiographic heart size measurement repeatability and reproducibility among veterinary students with varying training levels.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vertebral heart scale (VHS) and vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) are commonly used to assess the heart size. It remains unknown if observers with different levels of training within the same protocol would improve the repeatability and reproducibility. This study aims to describe the measurement errors and to assess if different levels of experience can influence the outcome. Radiographs of healthy dogs and dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease were included. Nine veterinary students were divided into three groups and followed a learning phase by measuring a set of 10, 30 and 50 images respectively, followed by an assessment of measurement error. Next, each group measured 20 radiographs twice, and the measurements of an experienced observer were used to calculate the reproducibility and repeatability. For VHS and VLAS measurements, 67.8% and 54.1% respectively, had at least one error. Interobserver agreement for VHS was comprised between 0.948 and 0.993 while for VLAS between 0.819 and 0.978. Intraobserver agreement for VHS was comprised between 0.959 and 0.995, while for VLAS between 0.71 and 0.994. This study shows that the measurement errors are common, however all students obtained a substantial to almost perfect agreement, suggesting that measuring experience does not influence the result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.