ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Severity of Onion Tearing and Chemosensory Sensitivity: A Preliminary Investigation.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Involuntary tearing is an annoyingly common consequence of cutting onions. Little is known about who experiences so-called "onion tears" and to what extent they experience them. Our aim with this study was to explore whether the degree of onion tearing is a phenotypic predictor of olfactory function and trigeminal sensitivity, assessed by both self-report and psychophysical measures of chemosensory function. Methods: A total of 1001 participants (598 females; Results: Results revealed that higher levels of onion tearing were associated with better self-rated olfactory ability, nasal breathing, and higher sensitivity to nasal stinging/burning. No statistically significant relationship was found between the psychophysical tests of olfactory ability and degree of onion tearing. Performance on all measures was also analyzed across three different age brackets (18-35; 36-55; 56+ years) and yielded mixed findings related to subjective ratings of trigeminal sensitivity and olfactory function. Conclusion: Clinically, there is yet to be a universally accepted measure to determine subjective chemosensory sensitivity, and in particular, trigeminal sensitivity. Despite inconsistencies between the subjective and objective chemosensory tests, our findings suggest that asking someone about the severity of their tearing while cutting onions may be a useful addition to standard testing assessing chemosensory and trigeminal sensitivity. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.