ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Impact of Socioeconomic Disparities Among Pediatric Airway and Otology Patients on Access to Care.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Socioeconomic Disparities Among Pediatric Airway and Otology Patients on Access to Care.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Socioeconomic disparities are ubiquitous in pediatric otolaryngology, yet there is no literature comparing barriers to care for patients who are referred for hearing and airway-related complaints. This study investigates the differences in obstacles to care between the pediatric otology and airway patient cohorts and how they influence patient access and compliance. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary children's hospital. All new patients seen in the otology or airway specialty clinics in 2019 were included. Area deprivation index, number of adults and children in the residence, insurance status, guardianship, distance traveled to the specialty clinic, referral status, follow up recommendations, and adherence to treatment recommendations and follow up were collected. Results: Three hundred and sixty three new patients were identified (160 [44.1%] otology, 203 [55.9%] airway). Otology patients were more likely to have a guardian other than the biological parent compared to airway patients (13.1% vs. 4.4%, Conclusions: Otology patients were more likely to be referred to the specialty clinic, have fewer no-shows, and attend a higher number of follow-up visits despite having minimal differences in social demographics. Future study targeting follow-up and retention for airway clinic patients is needed. Level of Evidence: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.