ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Knowledge level on prediabetes of family physicians and family medicine resident physicians.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prediabetes is a term that defines those people whose blood glucose levels are detected as being below the cut-off point to diagnose type 2 diabetes mellitus, but above what is currently established as "normal." In Mexico, an Mexican Institute of Social Security study reported a prevalence of 7.86% while according to the criteria of the FINDRISC scale, 66.7% of individuals presented a moderate to very high risk of developing diabetes. Determine the knowledge level of Family Physicians and Family Medicine Resident Physicians Regarding Prediabetes. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, and prospective study. Family Medicine Physicians and Resident Physicians who willingly accepted answering an evaluation on prediabetes through a previously validated instrument by expert personnel, were included. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and quantitative variables are expressed in terms of central tendency and dispersion measurements. Qualitative variables are expressed in percentages. Statistical analysis used IBM© SPSS Results: 159 research subjects with an average age of 36.7 ± 7.9 were included. The 65% ( Conclusions: The knowledge level of family medicine specialists and residents regarding prediabetes is insufficient, underscoring the need for training courses with a preventive focus on prediabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.