ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Research society model: Implementation protocol for medical schools and national medical bodies.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article serves as a protocol for implementing a Research Society (RS) within a medical school or under a National Medical Body (NMB). The RS Model (based on Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle) aims to promote research by providing a student-led foundation for budding researchers, enabling collaboration, idea exchange, access to various types of research and innovation opportunities in medicine, and skill development in scientific and research methodology. The RS model in an NMB is designed to facilitate high-quality, closely supervised, and better-monitored research training for students through national-level academic, research, and regulatory bodies in medicine. This protocol provides two frameworks for an RS in a medical school: a stand-alone model and a Students' Union-embedded model. The first step in creating an RS is constituting an executive team responsible for organizing hands-on activities such as research methodology and manuscript writing workshops, and events that foster research skills and scholarly growth. Other steps include constituting an Advisory Council consisting of faculty enthusiastic-and-well-oriented in research (with publications in PubMed-indexed journals) for guidance on events, projects, and support in problem-solving and overcoming challenges. The next step includes conducting peer-based mentorship programs, journal club meetings, and facilitating research projects. This initiative is expected to significantly increase research output and enhance structured mentorship opportunities. We developed this RS model following educational-psychological and evidence-based learning theories like Near-Peer Mentorship, Self-Determination, and Cognitive Load Reduction. Our model provides a replicable, scalable, and sustainable framework to make research an integral and enjoyable part of medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.