ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
The effects of predischarge postnatal care interventions following institutional deliveries in India on maternal and newborn health outcomes in the first year after discharge: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluated the effects of postnatal care (PNC) interventions provided to mothers delivering in hospitals or health centers in India, compared to alternative interventions or usual care, on maternal and neonatal health outcomes over the first year after discharge. We searched seven electronic databases for eligible quantitative and qualitative studies published between January 2000 and December 2024. Study selection, data management, and data synthesis were protocol-driven (PROSPERO-CRD42024554919). After screening 1212 records retrieved, we included only two nonrandomized interventional studies reported in five publications. We assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I assessment tool and reported results following the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. One study, reported in four publications, evaluated the Companion Care Programme (CCP), a structured, predischarge, postnatal educational and skills-building package incorporating evidence-based PNC interventions for mothers and family members to improve newborn care, followed by postdischarge support, compared to preintervention usual care. Moderate certainty evidence from a sample of 133,733 mothers from 28 public hospitals across four Indian states demonstrated that CCP reduced the risk of neonatal deaths by 18% (95% CI 7 to 29%). Outpatient visits increased by 27% (95% CI 1 to 47%), but readmissions reduced by 56% (95% CI 39 to 66%), maternal complications reduced by 12% (95% CI 3 to 21%), and neonatal complications by 16% (95% CI 9 to 14%). The effects on exclusive breastfeeding rates were less certain with the CCP, and with a video-based breastfeeding educational program added to standard lactational counseling, versus only lactational counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.