ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Incidental Gynecological Premalignant and Malignant Lesions in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the frequency and clinicopathological features of incidental premalignant and malignant gynecological lesions detected after hysterectomies performed for benign indications, and to identify associated risk factors. Methodology: This retrospective study reviewed 1,047 hysterectomies performed for benign conditions at a tertiary center in Ankara, Turkiye, over a ten years period (January 2006-December 2015). Demographic characteristics, preoperative assessments, surgical indications, and histopathological outcomes were analyzed. Incidental lesions were defined as pre-malignant or malignant pathologies identified postoperatively without prior clinical suspicion. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square and t-tests. Results: Incidental pre-malignant or malignant lesions were identified in 6% (n=63) of cases, including cervical dysplasia/HSIL (0.9%), borderline ovarian tumors (1.1%), endometrial adenocarcinoma (0.5%), leiomyosarcoma (0.5%), and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (0.6%). Postmenopausal women had a significantly higher incidence than premenopausal women (9.2% vs. 3.8%, p<0.001). Patients with incidental findings were older than those with benign pathology (55.4 ± 11.2 vs. 52.7 ± 9.6 years, p=0.034). Larger myomas were associated with uterine sarcoma (172 ± 92 mm vs. 71 ± 39 mm, p<0.001). Ovarian malignancies were detected in 2.4% of cases without suspicious ultrasound features and in 14.8% of cases with ≥2 malignancy criteria (p=0.013). Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) was identified in 0.28% (n=3). Conclusion: Incidental pre-malignant or malignant lesions were present in 6% of hysterectomies performed for benign indications. Age, menopausal status, myoma size, and suspicious imaging features were significant predictors. Preoperative evaluation may not completely exclude the possibility of occult pathology; therefore, this risk should be discussed during preoperative counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.