ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Development of the low back health awareness in patient transfer scale for operating room and intensive care unit staff and evaluation of factors associated with low back pain.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Low back pain is a widespread musculoskeletal problem that causes significant social and economic burdens by leading to loss of working capacity and functional impairment. Those who transfer patients, particularly operating theatre and intensive care staff, are at high risk. This study aimed to develop the low back health awareness in patient transfer scale (LBHAPTS) and evaluate the prevalence, risk factors and consequences of back pain among these personnel. Methodology: This methodological study developed the LBHAPTS through item generation, content validity, pilot testing, factor analyses (EFA, CFA), and reliability testing, with data from 288 healthcare workers. Results: The 22-item scale demonstrated high validity (S-CVI/Ave = 95.45%) and reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.910; ICC = 0.882). Factor analyses confirmed a three-factor structure explaining 57% of the total variance. Model fit indices were acceptable (χ Conclusion: Our study concludes that the scale is a useful and reliable tool, highlighting the importance of training and knowledge to reduce ergonomic risks and promote safe patient transfer practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.