ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Clinical and pathological factors associated with recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A single-center retrospective study.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Radical cystectomy (RC) is standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC); however, disease recurrence remains a major challenge. This study aimed to describe recurrence patterns and explore clinical and pathological factors associated with early recurrence post-RC. Methodology: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with histologically confirmed bladder cancer who underwent RC at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Center, Lahore, between February 2023 and August 2025. Demographic, pathological, treatment, and follow-up data were extracted. Recurrence status was available for 40 patients and was analyzed using descriptive statistics and univariate analyses. Results: Among 70 patients, follow-up sufficient to evaluate recurrence was available for 40 (57.1%). Recurrence occurred in nine patients (9/40, 22.5%) during the available follow-up period. Mean time to recurrence among affected patients was 5.0 ± 2.7 months. Histological subtype showed a possible signal with recurrence, with squamous cell carcinoma appearing more frequently among recurrence cases (p = 0.019); however, this observation was based on a very small number of patients and should be interpreted with caution. Other demographic, tumor-related, and treatment variables were not significantly associated with recurrence. Follow-up duration was varied and shorter among recurrence cases compared with non-recurrence cases, which may establish detection bias. Conclusion: In this single-center cohort, early recurrence after radical cystectomy was observed in a subset of patients; however, the small sample size, short follow-up duration, and substantial loss to follow-up limit reliable identification of predictors. Larger prospective studies are needed to characterize recurrence patterns post-RC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.