ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Clinical effects of the Collaborative Care Model on pulmonary function and quality of life in postoperative patients with lung cancer.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) in improving pulmonary function and quality of life in patients following lung cancer surgery. Methodology: This was a retrospective study. Eighty patients who underwent radical lung cancer resection at Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University's Department of Thoracic Surgery between January 2022 to June 2025 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the observation group(n= 40, received CoCM in addition to the standard postoperative care based on the control group) and the control group(n= 40, received standard postoperative care) according to their choice of postoperative nursing approach. Pulmonary function parameters, arterial blood gas(ABG) parameters, activities of daily living(ADL) were compared between the two groups. Results: At seven days, one month, and three months post-intervention, pulmonary function parameters showed progressive improvement in both groups. The observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements at each time point compared with the control group( Conclusion: The implementation of CoCM for patients recovering from lung cancer surgery can significantly enhance pulmonary function and ABG while also improving ADL and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.